Chevy Colorado & GMC Canyon banner

Fuel Filter Micron Ratings

4.5K views 12 replies 9 participants last post by  Jacqson  
#1 ·
I know this has been discussed in the past, but I'm looking to put together this thread for any concrete info that anyone has, for micron ratings on the diesel fuel filters.

@DieselDrax @Duken4evr - I know you guys have discussed this before curious if you have found any new info.

WIX - WF10226 (No listing)
GM GENUINE - TP1007 (No listing) Same as AC DELCO 52100212
DOC'S - DGF418 - 3 Micron rating with 99.7% Efficiency rating (Doc's website)

Curious if their is any data that shows one brand is better than the other. So far Doc's is the only listed data I've been able to find.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Duken4evr
#2 · (Edited)
I know this has been discussed in the past, but I'm looking to put together this thread for any concrete info that anyone has, for micron ratings on the diesel fuel filters.

@DieselDrax @Duken4evr - I know you guys have discussed this before curious if you have found any new info.

WIX - WF10226 (No listing)
GM GENUINE - TP1007 (No listing) Same as AC DELCO 52100212
DOC'S - DGF418 - 3 Micron rating with 99.7% Efficiency rating (Doc's website) Curious if their is any data that shows one brand is better than the other. So far Doc's is the only listed data I've been able to find.
It's interesting (at least to me) that the micron rating for the OEM and even the aftermarket 2.8 fuel filters is seemingly a state secret, while the CAT, Wix and other filters aimed at the heavy duty market's micron ratings are at least openly claimed by the manufacturers. The Doc's filter you mentioned is the only one I am aware of that claims a micron rating (3 at 99.7 efficiency as you stated) for our 2.8s. Drax found an independent lab test of a Doc's filter for another diesel pickup that suggests their claimed micron rating is optimistic. Be that as it may, at least they make a claim!


I doubt marketing being optimistic is unusual at all when it comes to fuel filter micron ratings - marketing tends to tell tall tales, and I doubt the HD truck filters are any different. At least with the HD truck filters there are claims, I figure somewhat exaggerated information from the manufacturer's marketing department is better than no info at all!

I have no idea if there is any deficiency with our OEM filtration or not, but our injector issues makes me wonder. It would be great to have an autopsy by a suitably qualified person on a failed injector to tell us why it failed. GM has a history of using inadequate 10 micron filters in the older Duramaxes. The OEM filtration has been improved since then, and our 2.8s no doubt have improved filters as well. Have read way too much on this and believe that particles around the 7 micron range are problematic, as they can damage injectors over time, but they are quite small. My guess is the OEM filters are 5 micron at a high efficiency rating, with an "absolute" figure of around 7. This is just a total guess though.

Being bored during COVID, I decided I wanted to make sure about filtration, and went down the admittedly a bit over the top 2nd pass filter rabbit hole. It is nice to know for sure that the 2nd pass HD truck filter is providing claimed 2 micron filtration. Our lift pump has no issue with the 2nd filter; the filter head and filter itself are not expensive. The biggest obstacle to adding a 2nd filter is fitting it, especially on short box trucks. I have a long box which provides a luxurious amount of space to work with while adding the 2nd filter.

From what I gather reading about it, the 2 micron filters need changing often in HD use unless they have a less fine prefilter in front of them to catch the bigger stuff. Adding and adaptor and swapping out the OEM filter for a CAT is a pretty common mod with the older big Duramaxes. In my case, the OEM system is the "prefilter". The CAT 1R 0750 unit seems to be the gold standard in the HD market. I may swap my Wix HD filter for a CAT as I figure if I went this far, I might as well go all the damn way :LOL:
 
#3 ·
I know this has been discussed in the past, but I'm looking to put together this thread for any concrete info that anyone has, for micron ratings on the diesel fuel filters.

@DieselDrax @Duken4evr - I know you guys have discussed this before curious if you have found any new info.

WIX - WF10226 (No listing)
GM GENUINE - TP1007 (No listing) Same as AC DELCO 52100212
DOC'S - DGF418 - 3 Micron rating with 99.7% Efficiency rating (Doc's website)

Curious if their is any data that shows one brand is better than the other. So far Doc's is the only listed data I've been able to find.
TBH, don't get too stuck on this micron rating stuff. I remember when I had my 2012 6.6 Dmax and I went nuts about micron ratings, filter media etc and in the end the OEM filter was the best one out there and it was made by Baldwin. The only thing I did do to make the OEM or final filter last longer was to add another filter with a lift pump before the OEM filter. I never heard of anyone who had an engine or fuel system failure because of the OEM fuel filter. I'm not saying it can't happen, but it is very rare The same can be said about oil filters as well. JMHO
 
#4 ·
I think there's some general concern about fuel quality with injectors sticking on the 2.8L... Mostly from early years, but there have been 2x 2019 failures reported recently.

I've seen cars recalled for much less of a reason (especially recently), yet for some reason GM has been silent about this, hence why I encourage owners of blown up 2.8l to file NHTSA reports about it.
 
#5 ·
I know this has been discussed in the past, but I'm looking to put together this thread for any concrete info that anyone has, for micron ratings on the diesel fuel filters.

@DieselDrax @Duken4evr - I know you guys have discussed this before curious if you have found any new info.

WIX - WF10226 (No listing)
GM GENUINE - TP1007 (No listing) Same as AC DELCO 52100212
DOC'S - DGF418 - 3 Micron rating with 99.7% Efficiency rating (Doc's website)

Curious if their is any data that shows one brand is better than the other. So far Doc's is the only listed data I've been able to find.
I haven't done any additional research recently, the most recent was when I looked into Doc's filters/website and noticed discrepancies in data, for example the same micron rating is shown for different filters that are a totally different design. I then dug into some of the reports they published and noticed the micron rating listed on the product page doesn't match the rating shown in the report. Add all that up and it was enough to convince me that Doc's claims can't be trusted. Doc's also doesn't make their own filters, the filters for the 2.8 are made by Premium Guard. That said, Doc's filters are cheaper than the same filters in Premium Guard packaging.

The filter media is different than OEM, whether or not it's better or worse I don't know but I still have some ACDelco filters sitting in the garage that I need to consume before I buy more. I just wish we had verifiable, trusted data for fuel filters that aren't supplied by the people trying to sell the filters that they don't even make themselves...
 
owns 2017 GMC Canyon Denali
  • Like
Reactions: Duken4evr
#7 ·
I concur about the rebranded Doc's filters.

I believe our trucks have good lift pumps in them. So far so good with the 2nd pass claimed 2 micron absolute CAT 1R 0750 filter. Like the dearly departed failed Racor "SNAPP" unit before it, the extra filter doesn't register on the DIC filter life screen at all. CAT does make its filters, and just holding one in my hand it does appear to be a better quality unit. Also, I figure if the CAT filter is good enough for a semi, it is good enough for our 2.8s :LOL:
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedEye
#10 ·
Only two of us on the board have done the 2nd pass filter. Still running the CAT 1R-0750 spin on filter on a NAPA filter head on my truck with no issues at all. Not sure it's necessary but having the commercial grade CAT filter in the system makes me feel warm and fuzzy inside!

Back then I was very focused on protecting the injectors as it was thought they were the reason for the piston hole failures. Now we believe the pistons themselves are the issue, perhaps exacerbated by low cetane American diesel. Check this thread out for the fuel filter madness. Skip to the end unless really bored :LOL:

 
#12 ·
I am still running the Racor unit on my short bed. It has been flawless and my install used custom cut stainless steel brackets and a protective shield to reduce the potential for a rock hit or other object hitting the filter body. I do carry a spare just in case. Experience with the CAT filter has also been great on a 2000 TDI Golf. Easier set up on those engines than the Canyon. Just not a lot of mounting options for the CAT unit on the truck.