If you reread the posts you will see the problem starts with the seemingly erroneous assumption that I used BLACKSTONE.
The first response to my post was;
"Blackstone doesn’t use the proper testing methodology and nor is your 0.1% it a real number."
He doesn't actually say I used Blackstone but indicates my result is not a real number. Later responses kept referring to Blackstone testing.
I reposted a modified initial post hoping he would rethink his first response and ask the obvious question.
As far as this goes-
"If someone says "values from X are invalid" and the only reply after that is still repeating "my value is Y" but not saying it's not from X then...we end up here. This could've been avoided if you had provided the info on who did your test in the first place before all of this back-and-forth took place to finally get to the bottom of it."
We end up here because someone assumed Y is from X. This could have been avoided if he had simply questioned a false assumption and asked who did the test. You figured it out.
How does one conclude I used Blackstone based on the very limited info that I initially provided. This is especially concerning when the poster was only looking for non Blackstone results. I would like to know?