Joined
·
86 Posts
Unemployment rates and insurance claims are hitting the lowest points they've been for 20 years.
I'm not inclined to believe those numbers are realistic because they conveniently ignore labor force participation rates.View attachment 432232
Unemployment rates and insurance claims are hitting the lowest points they've been for 20 years.
labor force participation rate
These numbers do not tell the whole story. I think the one statistic that I have seen in the last few years is the Labor Participation Ratio. A lot of people have just dropped out of the workforce. The WHY of that is complicated, I believe. (I see @rotaryenginepete made the same comment while I was typing this.)(Graph deleted just to save space)
Unemployment rates and insurance claims are hitting the lowest points they've been for 20 years.
Yes, but since 2008 (roughly) I think the BLS no longer includes that in calculating the Unemployment Rate (there was also a bunch of other changes to the math). So the true rates are actually much higher.
They're different statistics.Yes, but since 2008 (roughly) I think the BLS no longer includes that in calculating the Unemployment Rate (there was also a bunch of other changes to the math). So the true rates are actually much higher.
Yes they are different statistics, but do you understand how they are related and calculated? If you change the definition of what is considered "looking for work", then you can easily alter both statistics to look more favorable. One way the BLS does this by utilizing six different methods of calculating unemployment, called U-1, U-2, U-3, U-4, U-5, and U-6. Each method uses a different definition of "looking for work".They're different statistics.
![]()
How the Government Measures Unemployment
www.bls.gov
If you've got numbers to the contrary backed up by data, feel free to share.
If you've got numbers to the contrary backed up by data, feel free to share.
All those numbers are at or within a few tenths of a % of the lowest they've been in 20 years.
Nah, you just didn't see it because people thought they "had" to take those jobs. They were still **** jobs with awful pay.Before 2020, we had more jobs than actual available workers. They were good jobs too with good pay. Now those jobs have crap pay, crap bosses and are menial as hell. Couple that with crippling school debt, rampant inflation and rent unaffordability, and unemployment might be low but people are saying screw it.
Most of the good household appliances we have are made in Germany. They have good pay and benefits for the most part at those plants. I don't see why we can't do more of the higher quality stuff here. The price point some folks look for in a vacuum cleaner for example is ridiculously low, pay less than $200 and throw it away in 2 years seems to be the norm........................................................................................................................
You want to fix it? Stop relying on China for everything from raw materials to manufacturing. Start making stuff here again. Will it suck and be expensive? Yes. But it's our only choice unless we want them to keep having us by the balls. God Forbid they invade Taiwan now.
And going back to my original point, each different method of figuring the unemployment rate necessarily changes the labor force participation rate. It's a shell game and every few years they add yet another "alternative method" to calculate it.All those numbers are at or within a few tenths of a % of the lowest they've been in 20 years.
It can be hard to find good quality items at times. Go try to find a pair of pants made in the US? A shirt? Shoes?Most of the good household appliances we have are made in Germany. They have good pay and benefits for the most part at those plants. I don't see why we can't do more of the higher quality stuff here. The price point some folks look for in a vacuum cleaner for example is ridiculously low, pay less than $200 and throw it away in 2 years seems to be the norm.
Yes.People don't want to work or don't Have TO WORK?
Honestly, if the average family could get along well with only one income, that would be ideal. That's the "good old days" politicians love to refer to back in the 1950s/1960s, so if a family can get by with one income and one parent can stay home (in a "nuclear" family), then that certainly won't hurt anything.Yes.
I think the reasons are pretty broad, plus people discovered during COVID that the second paycheck wasn't worth it. Whether that was the spouse working, or one person working two jobs.