The talk of both of these exists solely on these boards, too.Curt said:There has been talk of 3.6 v6 direct injection motor from the caddy used, it would have 304 hp and get better gas mileage than the current i5.
A diesel option is always a possibility in the future too.
That is a FWD based tranny(6T70) and amounts to turning our trucks into BOF Ridgelines. No thanks.CALI_COLY05 said:I agree that the stringent EPA standards could wind up Killing the V8. I am all for that 3.6 V6 and couple that
to the Saturn Vue Redline 6 speed Auto, grown up size 18 inch rims, and 4WD and AWD as options...GM is
really the pooch by not combining the inteligent design of the 3.6 V6 that stemmed from the
Grand national V6 (3.8L) they commandeered from Buick/Olds in the late 1980's. Hey Swapfans, V6 3.6
From a Wrecked Caddy might be useful?!!!